Determining the municipality waste fees and way of payment in Japan - Mariusz Grabda

Home > Events > Waste Management & Recycling Conference > News > • Press Releases > Determining the municipality waste fees and way of payment in Japan - Mariusz Grabda

Show Pages

Determining the municipality waste fees and way of payment in Japan - Mariusz Grabda

Dr. Eng. Mariusz Grabda
Dr. Eng. Mariusz Grabda is an Assistant Professor at Institute of Environmental Engineering of Polish Academy of Sciences, and currently a post-doc fellow in the Institute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials of Tohoku University in Japan. His primary research concerned on utilization of geothermal heat and natural utilization of sewage sludge. In recent years, his research area is dedicated to solid waste management, especially a thermal recycling of waste plastics containing brominated flame retardants. Mariusz Grabda is a member of the Program Committee of the Waste Management Conference Save the Planet, 28-30 March 2012, SAVE THE PLANET



  • The way of determining the garbage (municipality waste) fees and the way of payment.

    The per capital cost of MSW management in Japan is about $150/year (MoE, 2005). Many municipalities have introduced user fees, a commonly used method of financing MSW management. As of 2003, 42% and 70% of Japanese municipalities had introduced service fees for household and commercial MSW management, respectively (MoE, 2005). Prepaid garbage bags are the usual method of collecting garbage management fees from Japanese households. However, if all of these costs were recovered from users, the necessary fee would be about $5 for a typical kitchen garbage bag (MoE, 2005). Thus, most municipalities have introduced user-fee systems as an economic incentive to reduce the amount of MSW rather than as a primary source of program financing. Many municipalities charge fees for management of special waste, such as bulky waste.

    MSW programs are financed almost wholly by government authorities, and although municipalities are integrally involved in MSW management, the national government closely controls MSW management through public financing mechanisms.

    The sources of MSW management funding for 2002 included ‘‘general revenues’’ of municipalities (75%), local bonds (12%), user fees (7%), and special national grants (3%) (MoE, 2005).

    Central government funding helps rural communities in Japan afford expensive MSW management systems even though they have limited financial resource bases of their own. These less populated areas are thus able to resist becoming the dumping grounds for cities.

    The Japanese central government also provides direct funding for MSW facility construction. In 2000, $8 billion was used to construct MSW facilities, and of that total amount, projects costing $5 billion were funded through national grants. Only 3% of this $5 billion came from municipal general revenues. The other 97% was covered through the special national grant fund (37%), local bonds (58%), and prefectural grants (1%) (Yorimoto 2003). 

  •  How the landfills are managed in your country?

    Landfills for municipal waste are usually operated by local governments, which secure sufficient land for future needs within their area because they have the responsibility of dealing with municipal waste discharged from their own districts. As a result of soaring costs, difficulties in sitting MSW management facilities, and pollution problems, more municipalities are choosing to manage their MSW jointly. About 35%, 50%, and 45% of all municipalities jointly implemented recovery, incineration, and final disposal operations, respectively.  Landfills for industrial waste are usually operated by private companies, most of which are small or medium-sized firms that do not have enough internal reserves to develop landfills for the future. Thus, they usually get bank loans for construction of landfills. As a bank finances them for 10 years at most, they have to plan to get returns from their investment within that period. The term might be shorter than 10 years, perhaps eight years, considering that the construction period is approximately two years.

  • What is the actual percentage of collected waste packages from the collection systems in the municipalities in your country?

    The volume of containers and packages has become approximately 60 percent of the total municipal solid waste. The official MSW recycling rate was a relatively modest 16% in 2002. This figure does not include privately collected recyclables, such as newspapers recycled by private recyclers and glass bottles returned to retailers (these items are excluded from the government’s figures because they are not considered waste under the Waste Management and Public Cleansing Law). If privately recycled materials are added into the official recycling figures, the national MSW recycling rate rises to 35%.  The Container and Packaging Recycling Law was enacted in 1997 in order to promote efficient use of recycled containers and packages generated and reduction of wastes by shifting those wastes into recyclable resources. Since April 2000, plastic containers and packages other than PET bottles and paper containers and packages other than paper cartons for drinks have included in the target items of recycling, as well as the scope of specific business entities has been expanded under this Law.

Exhibitions & Conferences

Sofia Sport & Healthy Life Exhibition


Via Expo is a Member of:

Bulgarian Association of Recycling

Bulgarian Photovoltaic Association

Bulgarian- Swiss Chamber of Commerce

German-Bulgarian Chamber of Industry and Commerce

Bulgarian Industrial Association

Green tips: Learn how you can reduce the environmental impact of your daily actions, whether at home, at work or on the road.


Novel method of vulnerability assessment of simple landfills area using the multimedia, multipathway and multireceptor risk assessment (3MRA) model, China

Vulnerability assessment of simple landfills was conducted using the multimedia, multipathway and multireceptor risk assessment (3MRA) model for the first time in China. The minimum safe threshold of six contaminants (benzene, arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)], divalent mercury [Hg(II)] and divalent nickel [Ni(II)]) in landfill and waste pile models were calculated by the 3MRA model...
23/09/16|05:10 --

Private sector participation in domestic waste management in informal settlements in Lagos, Nigeria

Lagos is one of the fastest growing cities in Africa, which is grappling with the challenges of poorly managed urbanisation. With an estimated population of about 17.5 million, solid waste management is one of the most pressing environmental challenges currently faced in the city...
23/09/16|05:10 --

EUR 150 Mio support for a biomass and waste-fired cogeneration plant in Lithuania approved by the EC

The state owned energy group of Lithuania is building a EUR 345 million biomass and waste-fired...
19/09/16|04:40 --

Planning for the closure of uncontrolled landfills in Turkey to reduce environmental impacts

Landfilling is the most preferred solid waste disposal method in Turkey owing to both economic and technical reasons. However, beside the sanitary landfills there are also hundreds of uncontrolled waste sites located throughout Turkey, which are often left either abandoned or burning...
19/09/16|05:10 --

Occupational exposure to the municipal solid waste workers in Chandigarh, India

Manual handling of municipal solid waste is of serious concern owing to emerging occupational risks. Considering this, health risks of municipal solid waste workers involved in street sweeping, waste collection, waste processing and rag picking were assessed in Chandigarh, India, using an interview schedule as a study tool...
17/09/16|05:10 --

Sustainability assessment and prioritisation of bottom ash management in Macao

In Macao, about 7200 t yr–1 of bottom ash (BA) is generated and conventionally landfilled with construction waste. Because the properties of BA are similar to those of natural aggregates, it is suitable to be recycled as construction material...
17/09/16|05:10 --

Construction and demolition waste generation rates for high-rise buildings in Malaysia

Construction and demolition waste continues to sharply increase in step with the economic growth of less developed countries. Though the construction industry is large, it is composed of small firms with individual waste management practices, often leading to the deleterious environmental outcomes...
17/09/16|05:10 --

Multi-criteria decision making to support waste management: A critical review of current practices and methods

Solid waste management is a complex domain involving the interaction of several dimensions; thus, its analysis and control impose continuous challenges for decision makers. In this context, multi-criteria decision-making models have become important and convenient supporting tools for solid waste management because they can handle problems involving multiple dimensions and conflicting criteria...
15/09/16|05:10 --


2016 edition
was realized under
the patronage of:



Long-term Supporting Partner - Austria



With the Support of:


Media Sponsor:


Official Media Partners


Official Hotel:


VIP Company: